Thursday, February 15, 2007

Levitation Defies Gravity


I updated this blog to include two videos of the levitation experiments we did in the office of DZRH, MBC Building, Pasay City. I first posted this article last October 16, 2005.

Levitation defies gravity. We proved it when we lifted up an 80-kilo man using our two fingers each of 4 people in the activity. We did it inside the DZRH Newscenter just to make ourselves relax and have fun after a whole day work.

It all started when me (RS) and Chris Capulso decided to make an experiment about the process of levitation we learned from an ESP seminar (Mr. Licauco's Inned Mind), several years back. I said an experiment because I don't want other people in the group expect more than they have in their mind. Mostly they think, it will take a long process before we can lift a man, well we just did it within 2-3 minutes.

Me, Chris, Anna Marie Gonzales and Cecille Villarosa (Lito's daughter) agreed to lift Sherwin Alfaro in that particular levitation experiment and we succeed.

Another person, teenage Shafel Subido, a student, voluntered to be lifted just to experience the sensation of levitating or floating.

I've uploaded the videos of our levitation experiments: http://misteryo.multiply.com/video/item/63
http://misteryo.multiply.com/video/item/64
If you have problems signing in to watch the video, try clicking the multiply.com logo ang join the network.


Here are the testimonies of people involved in the experiment.

Anna Marie (RH writer, reporter)
"If there’s a saying that goes like this, “to see is to believe”.…then what more if i describe it as… “to make it happen, is more than the truth…” That idea came to my mind whenever i recall that unusual event in my life..***levitation****… if seeing is enough to believe, then what more can you say if you yourself proved that it is really possible? Honestly, at first i did not believe that it is possible to lift someone using your mind… but when rey and cris insisted that i should try and see for myself, i was really hesitant, im so nervous…Finally, they were able to convince me because the group needs at least four persons to levitate someone…At the back of my mind, i’ve got doubts, but i tried to set them all aside and concentrate... One…inhale…exhale…..two….im drawing a picture in my mind…three…im trying to see a white light…four…the white light became a thin white cloth…five..inhale..exhale…six ….sherwin is soooo light….seven…i can lift him using my two fingers….eight….i can make it happen…nine..i am strong…..ten!!! Boom!!!! He’s up!!!! I’m lifting him….four people…eight fingers…versus..an 80 kg. Man…..I opened my eyes and realized i did it…i was one of the four people who lifted a very heavy man with eight fingers..imagine, the unbeliever..was able to make things happen…I was screaming after that….i can’t believe...It was a very relaxing experience, something out of the ordinary..i was proud of myself, i did it…now i know i can make things possible…all it takes is a focused, relaxed, positive and powerful mind….I learned a lot from this experience, i’m very honored to share these to our readers..that levitation is possible, it is not magic, it is not a miracle, it is the truth--- it is power… everyone can do it..not just those who have psychic powers, all you need is an open mind…That event was a learning experience for me.. I learned that levitation can be applied in our daily lives…We just have to be positive, everyday we are faced with problems and difficulties in life..all it takes is a right attitude and positive thinking and we are ready to lift the heavy load of problems… don’t underes timate yourself.. Just like me, you…yes you, can conquer the world!!!"

Sherwin (RH writer)
"I was hesitant at first that with my weight (80 kls) they'll be able to raise me more that 5 feet above the ground. Then rey ask me to concentrate and think that im just a feather. So i did. Iconcentrated and think of my self as a feather...Then i can feel a swirling heat above my head when they put their hands above me. And i in my thoughts, i see a small white feather, falling slowly from no where. Then, using their fingers( ana, chris, cecil and rey), they lift me from my chair. Closed-eyes, i can feel that im just floating with no weight at all. In my mind, i've seen my self floating for a second and turned my head back, i see the chair below me. I was shocked to see my self floating with the way they lift me and then i felth the weight back in me and they brought me down."

Cecille (RH writer)
"There's only one way to describe it...i'm completely STUNNED! But I wouldn't deny it...doubt fills my mind at first (Sir knows about it). The thought of raising a man that seems to be heavier than a refrigrator (dyok dyok lang!) like Mr. Sherwin aka "BATA" Alfaro makes me laugh..and of course disbelieving (bwahahahahah!). But then, I give in to their plea and give it a try. Nothing's wrong in the first place. Obviously seeing how big our 'experiment' is, I thought it would take us an hour of ceremonies and long deep concentration before we can put our mission into rest. But this time, my notion fails me. With Mr. Rey's easy instruction, with our hands alternately crossing over Kuya Sherwin's head, and with a count of 10... presto! The MISSION SUCCEEDS! NO SWEAT! Sherwin was up there! He was as weightless as a feather! Sir Rey is right after all! It took me time before I can react... I'm completely stunned! Imagine, lifting an 80-kg man without a single burden! Hah, such a thing that boils down deep within my concocted brain! I just want to ask...will it also be applicable to heavy objects...say a real refrigerator or a cavans of rice? I hope so..."

Shafel (student, Univ of Perpetual Help, LP)
"The experience was nerve wracking but fun. The feeling was normal when i was lifted up. It felt like a person is just carrying me normally. But when i saw the video that I was lifted up so high and they told me that I was so light, I was so amazed. It seems like it was magic but it felt normal at all."

Sunday, November 06, 2005

The Psychic Powers of Nina Kulagina


Nina Kulagina was only fourteen when the Nazis began the siege of Leningrad. Like many Leningrad children she had to become a soldier, and along with her father, brother and sister, she joined the Red Army and was sent into the thick of the action. The conditions during the 900 day siege were appalling. Winter temperature sometimes reached forty degrees below zero, bread rations were about four ounces a day, the water and the electricity were cut off, and the city was devastated by bombs and artillery fire. Nina served on the front line in Tank T-34 as a radio operator, and distinguished herself enough to become senior sergeant. But the fighting came to an end for her when she was seriously injured by artillery fire. She managed to recover and later settled down, married and had a son.

Powers of the Mind
Nina was always aware that she had psychic powers. She could mentally see things inside people’s pockets, and when she met sick people she could identify the disease they were suffering from, an image of the illness appearing in her mind. On one occasion when she was in a particularly angry mood, she was walking towards a cupboard in her apartment when a jug in the cupboard suddenly moved to the edge of the shelf, fell and smashed to pieces on the floor. After that, changes began to take place in her apartment. Lights went on and off; objects became animated and seemed somehow to be attracted to her. It was similar to having a poltergeist, but Nina knew the psychic power was coming from her, and discovered that, if she tried, she could control it.

In 1964, while in hospital recovering from a nervous breakdown, Nina spent a lot of time sewing. Doctors were amazed when they saw that she was able to reach into her sewing basket and choose any colour of thread she needed without looking at it. Local parapsychologists were contacted and the following year, when she had fully recovered, she agreed to take part in various experiments. Nina was tested and it was found that she could indeed ‘see’ colours with her fingertips, bringing to mind Rosa Kuleshova, a school teacher from the Ural Mountains, who also possessed this talent.

Kulagina also had extraordinary healing powers, she could, for example, make wounds heal up simply by holding her hand above them. She was also tested for Psychokinesis (PK) and the results were so remarkable that, in order to keep her real identity secret, she was obliged for many years to use the pseudonym of Nelya Mikhailova.

Nina would sit at a table and stare at a small object, such as a matchbox or a wineglass, and make it move without touching it. Apparently her powers did not come straight away, hours of preparation may be needed, which, as sceptics have pointed out, does not favour the setting up of strictly supervised demonstrations. In order to move things with mind power alone she found she had to clear all other thoughts from her head, and told investigators that when her concentration was successful, there was a sharp pain in her spine, and her eyesight blurred. Nina practiced hard, focusing her powers, and was soon able to move matchsticks, fountain pens and compass needles.

One of the first scientists to take an interest in her was Biologist Edward Naumov. In an early test he scattered a box of matches on a bench; Nina held her hands over them, trembling with the strain. Suddenly, all the matches moved together to the edge of the bench, then fell one by one to the floor.

Nina' s Psychic Powers on Film
Stories of this amazing woman began to reach the West through the international wire services in the spring of 1968. In the same year, films of Kulagina moving objects, ostensibly using only her mind, were shown at the First Moscow International Conference on Parapsychology and were also seen by some Western scientists. For a brief time Western investigators were permitted to meet Russian mediums, witness Nina Kulagina for themselves and verify the reports of her PK abilities made by Soviet scientists. In1970 William A. McGary, one of a group from the United States investigating psychic phenomena in Russia, described a session in which Kulagina caused several small objects, including a wedding ring and the top of a condiment bottle, to move across a dining-room table. She also caused the wedding ring to rotate on an invisible axis on the table. Another of the American investigators, Gaither Pratt, of the University of Virginia, stated that the objects which Kulagina could move varied widely in material, shape and weight, and when they moved they progressed slowly and steadily, or occasionally in fits and starts. Precautions were taken to make sure that Kulagina wasn’t using a concealed magnet or threads, and films were taken of the experiments which confirm that no known force could explain the movements.

Dr. Zdenek Rejdak, a prominent Czech scientist connected with a Prague Military Institute, tested Kulagina personally and reported the results in Czech Pravda. He stated:
‘I visited the Kulagina family the evening of 26 February, 1968. Mr. Blazek, an editor friend was with me, also a physician, Dr. J.S. Zverev, and Dr. Sergeyev. Her husband, an engineer, was also present. Dr. Zverev gave Mrs. Kulagina a very thorough physical examination. Tests with special instruments failed to show any indication whatever of magnets or any other concealed object.

‘We checked the table thoroughly and also asked Mrs. Kulagina frequently to change position at the table. We passed a compass around her body and the chair and table with negative results. I asked her to wash her hands. After concentrating, she turned the compass needle more than ten times, then the entire compass and its case, a matchbox and some twenty matches at once. I placed a cigarette in front of her. She moved that too, at a glance. I shredded it afterwards and there was nothing inside it. In between each set of tests, she was again physically examined by the doctor.’

In one significant filmed Moscow test, set up by a group of well known physicists, several nonmagnetic objects including matches were placed inside a large Plexiglas cube. The cube was to prevent drafts of air, threads or wires; methods long favoured by sceptics as the means by which Kulagina performed her ‘tricks’. Her hands moved a few inches from the Plexiglas cover and the objects danced from side to side in the plastic container. In another filmed experiment, a ping-pong ball is seen levitating and hovering in the air for a few seconds, before falling back onto the table. In yet another she is shown both indoors and outside in a garden, where objects near her spin round or slide in different directions.

An additional and lesser known, ability of Kulagina was noted by physicist Dr. V.F. Shvetz. He observed that she was able to make the letters A or O appear on photo paper and sometimes could also transfer an outline of a picture she’d seen onto photo paper, recalling the ‘thoughtography’ talents of the controversial Ted Serios in America. Occasionally, unexplained burn marks appeared on Kulagina’s hands and, on several occasions, shocked scientists saw her clothes catch fire.

Towards the end of her life Kulagina demonstrated this power on TV, causing a bright red patch to appear on the arm of a European journalist.

Testing the Psychic
Doctor Leonid L. Vasiliev, a psychologist at Leningrad University, had pioneered ESP study in Russia at the Institute for Brain Research in Leningrad, and was one of the first to test Kulagina, continuing to do so right up until his death in 1966. His experiments with her were often filmed; in fact there are over 60 films of Nina in action. Unfortunately in many of these the picture quality is lacking, and it’s not always easy to see exactly what is going on. Another Soviet scientist, Dr. Genady Sergeyev, a well-known physiologist working in a Leningrad military laboratory, did several years of intensive laboratory research on Kulagina, and made special studies of the electrical potentials in Kulagina’s brain.

During observations he recorded exceptionally strong voltages and other unusual effects. In one series of experiments in Leningrad, recalling those of Dr. Shvetz, he and his colleagues placed undeveloped photo film in a black envelope. By staring at the envelope Kulagina was able to expose the film inside.

Strange Mind Power Experiment
One of Kulagina’s strangest filmed experiments involved the effect of her powers on a raw egg floating in a tank of saline solution almost two metres away from her. Using intense concentration, she slowly separated the yolk from the white of the egg, and moved the two apart; if she focused her energies for long enough, she could put the egg back together again. But the most unusual experiment of all took place in the Leningrad laboratory on 10 March, 1970. Satisfied that Kulagina had the ability to move inanimate objects, scientists were curious to know whether Nina’s abilities extended to cells, tissues, and organs. Sergeyev was one of the many scientists in attendance when Kulagina attempted to use her energy to stop the beating of a frog's heart, floating in solution, and then re-activate it. She focused intently on the heart and summoned all her powers. First she made it beat faster – then slower, and, using intense will power, she stopped it. Apparently she could also disrupt human heart beats – on one occasion giving a hostile Leningrad psychiatrist a frightening first-hand experience of her power.

In one of the (silent) films shot of experiments with Kulagina in her Leningrad apartment she is seen seated at a large, round, white table, in front of a lace-curtain window. According to Russian scientists she had, on this occasion, already been physically examined by a medical doctor, who had x-rayed her to make sure there were no hidden magnets or anything else concealed on her person, nor any pieces of shrapnel lodged in her body from her war injury. She was found to be clean and the experiment begun. The film crew, scientists – Naumov among them, and reporters, moved in for a close –up. Naumov placed a compass on a wristband, a vertical cigarette, a pen top, a small metal cylinder like a saltshaker, and a matchbox on the table in front of her. Kulagina began with the compass – apparently the easiest object to warm up on.
She held her fingers parallel to the table about six inches above the compass and started moving her hands in a circular motion. For a while nothing happened . . . then the needle quivered and slowly began to rotate counter clockwise, then the whole compass, case and all, began to spin.

IThe Impossibility of PK abilities
Naturally, Kulagina was not without her critics, but sometimes it went beyond criticism. In the Moscow paper Pravda there was a vicious attack on Kulagina, demonizing her and calling her a fake and a cheat. It was said that she performed her tricks with the help of concealed magnets and threads, though how magnets could move nonmagnetic things like glass, eggs, apples and bread was not explained. Kulagina also proved that she could move any one or two objects from a group chosen by the investigator. This again speaks against fraud. In the end it was revealed that the author of the Pravda piece had never even seen Kulagina. He had decided that PK was impossible therefore she must be cheating.

At the same time as the Pravda article, a campaign of harassing phone calls began against Kulagina. It was unlikely that these were merely harmless crank calls - there were no telephone books in Russia at that time; to get somebody’s phone number involved lining up for hours at special address booths in the streets. Secondly, she was known to the public as Nelya Mikhailova, not by her real name of Nina Kulagina. So whoever was calling had to know her real name and her address. It seems likely that it had been well organised. But by whom? Was the KGB involved? The calls finally got so out of hand that the scientists decided to hide Kulagina in the country outside Leningrad.

Contrary to what some sceptics have claimed, Kulagina was not only tested in her own apartment and in hotel rooms, but also by eminent Soviet scientists in controlled laboratory conditions. They more than once stated that after watching Nina in action that they had found ‘no hidden threads, magnets, or other gimmicks.’ Chairman of Theoretical Physics at Moscow University, Dr. Ya. Terletsky declared on 17 March, 1968, in Moscow Pravda: ‘Mrs. Kulagina displays a new and unknown form of energy.’ The Mendeleyev Institute of Metrology also studied Nina, and announced in Moscow Pravda that she had moved aluminium pipes and matches under stringent test conditions, including surveillance on closed-circuit television. They could not explain how the objects had moved.

But there was a down side to all this. Kulagina’s powers had always taken a lot out of her. After one set of tests with Dr. Rejdak she was totally exhausted, and had almost no pulse. Her face was pale and drained and she could hardly move her body. She had lost almost four pounds in half an hour (many Western mediums, such as American Felicia Parise, have also described this weight loss during PK); it was as if she were converting the matter of her own body into energy. According to Dr. Zverev’s report, her heart-beat was irregular, there was high blood sugar, and her endocrine system was disturbed. All this was consistent with high stress. She had also lost the sensation of taste, suffered from pains in her arms and legs, couldn’t coordinate, and felt dizzy.

Her powers eventually led to a strain on her health culminating, in the late seventies, in a near fatal heart attack. Her doctors recommended that she reduce her activity, though she kept up some lab work until she died in 1990, around the time of the death of the Soviet Union itself. At her funeral, Soviets praised her as a ‘hero of Leningrad’ after her bravery during the nine-hundred-day siege of World War II. But many also lauded her for sacrifices of a different kind to her country, allowing scientists and doctors to examine and test her incessantly in their quest for an unknown and elusive energy. In the end this exhausted her, ruined her health, and probably hastened her death.


Source: www.mysteriouspeople.com

Monday, October 24, 2005

Power of the Mind: Telekinesis



What is Telekinesis orPsychokinesis?
We have heard about Telekinesis (TK) or Psychokinesis (PK). In my own personal knowledge, telekinesis is the ability of our mind to influence an object without any physical force. Though in an average individual, you can apply a minor physical force when bending metal such as spoon. That is what we did when we attended a Basic ESP seminar of PHilippine's foremost Mind Development trainer/professor Jimmy Licauco.

Psychokinesis also means "re-shaping" of objects using the mind's energies by merely focusing an object (spoon, key) while holding it. The term itself comes from the Greek words psyche meaning life or soul and kinesis meaning to move.

It is believed that while doing this ability of the mind, the physical energy is created by electromagnetic impulses. What is the process? When doing the telekinesis, a person is tapping into his Chik, or the psychic energy also known as the universal life force energy, then combines it with physical energy.

More Facts About Psychokinesis
Psychokinesis From Wikipedia

Psychokinesis (literally "mind-movement") or PK is the more commonly used term today for what in the past was known as telekinesis (literally "distant-movement"). It refers to the psi ability to influence the behavior of matter by mental intention (or possibly some other aspect of mental activity) alone. As of 2004 the term remote influencing is becoming widely used for certain kinds of psychokinesis.

Psychokinetic events
There have been anecdotal reports of such apparent phenomena throughout history in various cultures. For example, poltergeist activity is typically characterized by objects being moved without apparent explanation, though some people claim that this is accounted for as unintentional PK by children going through puberty.

As with all psi phenomena, there is wide disagreement and controversy within the sciences and even within the field of parapsychology as to the very existence of psychokinesis and the validity or interpretation of PK-related experiments. To date there has never been a scientifically demonstrated instance of psychokinesis.

Parapsychologists usually make a distinction between macroscopic PK (large-scale effects observable by the naked eye or by a single measurement) and microscopic PK (small-scale effects only observable by statistical analysis of multiple measurements), and both types are still studied today, with more attention to the micro variety.

Some of the more extravagant accounts of macro PK in recent times were the so-called physical phenomena claimed to be observed during seances with mediums of the spiritualist era in the late 19th and early 20th century and studied by members of the Society for Psychical Research.

Such phenomena included table tipping, rapping, and levitation, and the playing of musical instruments with minimal or no contact. In more modern times, claimed macro PK phenomena include the remote bending of cutlery (usually forks or spoons) or metal bars, and the production of images on unexposed photographic film by Uri Geller and other psychics.
By its nature, study of micro PK phenomena requires an experimental approach.

The first recorded experiments of this type were conducted by J. B. Rhine and his associates in 1934, investigating whether subjects could affect the throws of dice. Similar experiments were soon conducted by many other parapsychologists.

Statistical results were generally far less than that observed for telepathy tests, and though a few anomalies were observed, no consensus emerged for the dice-tossing experiments. However, a 1989 meta-analysis by Diane Ferrari and Dean Radin of all such experiments in the literature from 1935 to that date showed an overall hit rate of 51.2% compared with chance expectation of 50%. Given the large number of trials involved, this is a significant figure, with odds against chance of more than a billion to one. There are critics of this analysis.

In more recent times, micro PK experiments have typically involved testing whether a subject can affect the outputs of random number generators (RNGs), aka random event generators, which generate a random bit stream based on the decay of radioactive materials or by electronic noise circuits.

In a typical experiment, a subject is given feedback regarding the output of a RNG in one form or another, e.g. audible clicks in one ear and the other through headphones or a graphical readout of an accumulator, and is asked to try to mentally influence the RNG to favor one output over another, e.g. cause more clicks in the right ear, or cause the graph to move to the left.

There are several reasons for the development of this type of experiment, one of them being the ease of automating such experiments, which not only makes data collection easier, but also makes it easier to design more secure (fraudproof) experimental protocols.

Notable researchers who pursue RNG experiments are Helmut Schmidt, who pioneered them in the 1960s; Robert Jahn and his associates at the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Lab center (PEAR); and Dean Radin.

A 1987 meta-analysis by Radin and Roger Nelson of such experiments from 1959 to that date covering 832 studies (235 of them control studies) showed a hit rate of about 51% for the experimental studies compared to 50% for the control studies (i.e. comparable to the dice tossing studies), with odds against chance of about 1 trillion to one. There are critics of this analysis.

During the 1950s-1960s, the Soviets conducted and presented research to various worldwide audiences in Psychokinesis, including levitation. One case was Nina Kulagina, a Leningrad housewife who demonstrated PK abilities to Western scientists. They witnessed the leviation and movements of various stationary objects, the changing of course of objects already in motion and the change of the rate of beating to a removed frog's heart.

Apparently the effort from speeding up and slowing the heart caused a lot of strain and could not be continued indefinitely, so Kulagina stopped the heart.RNG studies continue today, with long-term studies conducted at the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) center.

RNG devices are also used by the Global Consciousness Project. As a technological curiosity, on Nov 3rd, 1998 the US Patent Office granted Patent #5830064, "Apparatus and method for distinguishing events which collectively exceed chance expectations and thereby controlling an output", to inventors including several researchers from PEAR.

The patent in no way relies on the existence of psi phenomena, but in the description the inventors do suggest that "One application of the present invention is the investigation of anomalous interaction between an operator and random physical systems, whether by serious scientists or curious members of the public who would like to conduct experiments on their own."

The central idea of the patent is that a single device (microchip) includes both a true RNG and an accumulator circuit which can detect when the output of the RNG varies significantly from expected chance output. The output of the accumulator/detector circuit can then be used as an input to some control circuit.

The idea then is that if a PK channel is truly available, then an operator should be able to mentally affect the RNG such that the detection circuit triggers, providing a psi-controlled switch. No actual applications of this patent are known at the time of this writing.

Perhaps the most remarkable (and controversial) PK experiments involving RNGs were first conducted by Helmut Schmidt. Noting that some reported psi phenomena do not appear to be time bound, and that some interpretations of quantum theory posit a relationship between observer and the observed and the indeterminacy of some events until observed, Schmidt designed experiments in which a subject was asked to influence the output of an RNG after the output had already been recorded, i.e. the subject was being asked (unknown to the subject) to affect the behavior of the RNG over an interval of time in the past.

One of the advantages of such an experiment is the degree of security (fraud prevention) that can be designed into the protocol. After a series of such experiments with positive results (odds against chance of 1000 to 1) involving independent third-party observers, one of the observers, theoretical physicist Henry Stapp of UC Berkeley, wrote an article for the prominent journal

Physical Review in 1994 in which he attempted to show how PK might be consistent with a generalization of quantum theory, and that such phenomena merited further study.

There have also been studies of possible mental influence on living systems, such as the effects of prayer and remote healing, or, in research conducted in the former Soviet Union, the ability of one subject to induce hypnosis or wakefulness in another subject remotely.

Various models have been proposed for various aspects of PK as well as other psi phenomena, but so far there is no widely accepted physical theory or proposed mechanism that explains how such phenomena might occur. Many parapsychologists with backgrounds in physics point out that despite lack of a proposed mechanism for psi phenomena, the currently understood laws of physics do not preclude such phenomena, and they are confident that eventually extensions to today's physical theories will fill this gap. There are critics who disagree with this assessment.


Some Christian religious scholars believe that Psychokinesis is a spiritual gift and is apparent in various Bible stories, such as the release of Paul and Silas's bands during their escape from prison in Acts 16, and others.

Other religions also cite various cases of psychokinesis including Astral projection in Shamanism, Yogic flying, poltergeists and various healings.

Many parapsychologists believe that there is sufficient evidence of psychokinesis in controlled experiments to prove its existence and to justify it as a field of study.

Remote influencing
In recent years, the term remote influencing has been become popular to describe the application of psychokinesis to biological systems. This may be to impact either positively or negatively upon health, alter mood, or influence decision making.In a similar fashion, remote viewing has been applied to clairvoyance.

These terms emerged from research undertaken by the American government, for the application of psychic abilities to intelligence gathering, military force, and remote assassination.

Some of the most detailed claims in this area are made in The Men Who Stare At Goats, written by Jon Ronson to accompany his British TV series The Crazy Rulers of the World.

According to Ronson, over 100 de-bleated goats were shipped to Fort Bragg, North Carolina along with a significant quantity of hamsters, to facilitate this research, and remote influencers were said to have stopped the hearts of goats and hamsters long enough to cause death.

The programs are generally said to be secret, making verification difficult. Incidents of illness in world figures, such as George W. Bush's loss of consciousness after choking on a pretzel in January, 2002, have been ascribed to psychic attacks. Many websites offer to sell courses that purportedly teach remote viewing and remote influencing.

Source: www.crystalinks.com

Thursday, October 13, 2005

Are Pets Psychic?





Have you been noticed that your pets are somehow very sensitive to unseen beings or subtle energies? Are they psychic or just very sensitive?

There are stories of pets showed their extra-sensory abilities that may prove they have an advance sensing ability than humans do.

Stories such as: a pet cat jumps up onto the windowsill every day, several minutes before its owner arrives home; a pet dog barks just before a certain person calls on the phone, as if knowing the call was being made; a pet parrot, who's learned to talk, says things seemingly in response to what its owner is thinking; a beloved pet, somehow lost on a family trip, miraculously finds its way home - sometimes traveling hundreds or even thousands of miles

Most people believe that pets are more sensitive than humans to visual, aural, magnetic and other subtle environmental factors and changes. We also think that animals possess some innate psychic ability that allows them to tune in to human brainwaves or even to see the future.

Theorists are now in the middle of their debate about this matter, usually those in the field of the psychic phenomena studies, devoted pet owners, more skeptical people at those in the field of scientific research.

Rupert Sheldrake, author of Dogs That Know When Their Owners Are Coming Home (Three Rivers Press, 1999), believes that animals have abilities that humans may have possessed at one time, but somehow lost.

Through his extensive research, he has concluded that there are three major categories of unexplained perceptiveness by animals:

Telepathy - a psychic connection that some pets may have with their owners through connections Sheldrake calls "morphic fields." It is this ability that enables pets to "know" when their owners are on their way home.

The Sense of Direction - this ability accounts for the "incredible journeys" some animals make to be with their owners, including homing pigeons.

Premonitions - which may explain why some animals seem to know when earthquakes and other events are about to occur.

Though debates continue among researchers and theorists about the pets' sensitivity, the most important of all these is the idea that animal by nature is super-sensitive.

They can sense subtle vibrations, odors at electric and magnetic emissions resulting from the stresses within the earth.

But there are instances that it is much harder to explain, that animals or pets ruly seems to have foreknowledge of some disastrous event that involves them in a particular area.


source: paranormal.about.com